Reflection, refraction, and rebuttal: Data signatures of the March 2019 Christchurch massacre on Twitter

For PhD, studied 819,813 tweets, & around 14 million words in them produced after March 2019’s Christchurch massacre. Immediately evident is how Twitter today is unrecognisable from what the platform was then, & especially around discourse framing an unprecedented act of terrorism in New Zealand. 

Screenshot

Access it here as a PDF.

I’ve included the cover page of thesis, and abstract, in addition to the complete chapter. For those who fear/detest academic writing – I approached PhD as humanities scholar, & wrote it more as a story capturing key moments, avoiding, to extent possible, jargon.

Ten high-level insights from the chapter follow.

  1. In the aftermath of the Christchurch massacre, tweets within NZ and globally overwhelmingly expressed empathy, solidarity and condemnation of the attacks. There was little evidence of hate or violence promotion.
  2. The prosocial, victim-centric framing of the attacks on Twitter persisted for months after the massacre, both within New Zealand and internationally.
  3. The then PM Jacinda Ardern’s empathetic leadership and messaging after the attacks heavily influenced the largely positive, unifying tone on Twitter within New Zealand and beyond.
  4. The research contrasts starkly with Twitter discourse after the 2019 Easter attacks in Sri Lanka, which was far more divisive, conspiratorial and promoted Islamophobia.
  5. While social media can amplify hate after attacks, political leadership and media culture play a major role in shaping online discourse, as the New Zealand example shows.
  6. Engagement with the Christchurch attacker’s so-called manifesto and ideology gained little traction on Twitter in the aftermath, subsumed by messages of solidarity.
  7. Studying the same social media platform in different countries after terror attacks reveals Twitter is heavily influenced by sociopolitical context, not just technical features.
  8. Influential accounts, e.g. celebrities & politicians, helped promote prosocial messaging on Twitter after Christchurch, contrasting with “hate entrepreneurs” after Sri Lanka’s Easter attacks.
  9. The research challenges universal models of social media’s role in crises, showing platform effects are highly context-dependent.
  10. Strengthening democratic, empathetic responses to extremism can positively influence social media discourse after attacks, as in New Zealand after Christchurch.

3 years after massacre, in March 2021, I shared stage with Paul Ash – the PM’s Special Representative on Cyber & Digital, Christchurch Call & Cyber Coordinator – to present key findings. Paul’s presentation focussed on the Christchurch Call, relatively unknown to New Zealander’s at the time. I talked about the research on the massacre.

In what’s far more resonant, & poignant today than it was then, my research surfaced the virality of images of people had come out onto Gaza’s streets in solidarity with the victims of the massacre in New Zealand. A shared humanity, highlighted by Gazans, remains a valuable lesson today.

Screenshot

In addition to PhD chapter, pre-dating it, and also based on the research that fed into thesis, I’ve produced a lot of other articles, & presentations on March 2019’s massacre, & role of social media. A 2021 publication by the ICT4Peace Foundation compiled all of it.

Finally, a personal reflection. The love New Zealand garnered on Twitter after massacre was by order of magnitude more than what Sri Lanka attracted after Easter Sunday terrorism a month later that year, killing 5X more. I know, because I studied it for PhD. Unsure New Zealanders appreciate this. Value, & cherish it.

It’s incredibly sad that 5 years hence, the gun reform after the massacre to help with non-recurrence faces a real possibility of roll-back. Why? Why do this? New Zealand offered a socio-political, & socio-technological model to respond to terrorism fundamentally different to others. Why regress?

I hope reading the chapter helps better appreciate how political leadership shapes online discourse, & how a platform’s governance also matters in what are symbiotic relationships. My thoughts remain with those impacted by the March 2019’s massacre. May life be kind, gentle, & generous to you.